Houdini-and-Chill

this is literally my specialist subject, strap in 😈 there is indeed a lot of eyeballing wih various blurs, convolves, glows, chroma spread filters but there are a few more accurate things you can do: ✺ extract out-of-focus discs from real images and use them as convolution kernels, either in-render or in nuke with ZDefocus/pgBokeh ✺ match distortion and the way it changes with focus by shooting grids, crucial for for wide anamorphics ✺ both zeiss and cooke are slowly getting into the 21st century and providing distortion and vignetting data for their lenses, either online or via the data connection to the camera: cincraft.zeiss.com/us/home, cookeoptics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Cooke-i-Technology-Part-III-2021.pdf ✺ karma has a physical lens shader and octane has similar controls in its universal camera which at least try to render with aberrations (they are sooooo not based on actual lens designs tho)

✺ there a few tools for properly simulating flares from real lens designs appearing, e.g. dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3329715.3338881, beatreichenbach.github.io/realflare/, www.maxon.net/en/red-giant/vfx/real-lens-flares ✺ there’s another set of flare approaches that consider the whole image rather than single-point light flares, which are less physically-based but look awesome e.g. the video midway down www.fxguide.com/fxfeatured/the-batman-movie-keeping-it-real/ and to some extent the FFT-based bloom in game engines ✺ over the last decade or so there’s been a bunch of research into lens simulation for vfx which feels like it’s almost ready to get used, most obviously lentil.xyz/… I summarised a lot of the relevant papers in the pinned tweet thread on https://twitter.com/dearlensform and i’m perenially trying to make something based on those ideas – the hope is to simulate things that have to be guessed at currently like local contrast effects, astigmatism, pupil occlusion, veiling glare, colour effects beyond just scaling the blue channel a bit… ✺ there’s also TON of research going on right now about simulating lenses for machine vision because obviously the lens has a massive effect on how ML models “see” the world, and some of it might become applicable for vfx as well… i’m way behind with my reading but e.g. ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9919421, dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3197517.3201333, quan-zheng.github.io/publication/NeuroLens-paper.pdf

oh also i’m extremely curious about whether weta have some absolutely sick in-house tools for all this given how exacting both PhysLight and Manuka sound, the fact they they never talk about the obvious connection between the two (the lens) and the fact that they have a solid section of names in the credits labelled “Optics”… <:blobhyperthonk:503450826329817088>